<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opponents of Jekyll Revitalization Misguided</title>
	<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/</link>
	<description>Events, Musings, &#38; Just the Facts About Jekyll Island</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eric.garvey</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>eric.garvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Let me correct and respond to some of your statments:

1. The dune system is protected under Georgia law, and these protections are embraced by the Jekyll Island Authority and our partners. None of our plans call for construction that will harm the dune system.

2. Much of the conservation components of the beach village concept plan work towards restoring dune areas and wetlands that were disturbed when the original roads and parking lots were built in the 1950's.

3. The Jekyll Island Authority has design guidelines that dictate architectural style which are in keeping with the eclectic mix of architecture found in the Jekyll Island Historic District. Much of this is classic cottage style with shingle roofs and clapboard siding. There is a mix of Italian Rennaissance and Queen Anne influences, and even a mix of tabby stucco, which overall gives it a characteristic that is unique to Jekyll. All new construction must comply with our Design Guidelines.

4. The Jekyll Island Authority must generate revenue to care for the island, including the 250-acre Historic District and the dozens of historic structures. Even though these are public assets, the trend in state government is to rely on private or philanthropic sources for funding. Jekyll Island receives no regular funding from the state budget.

5. In order to attract private capital and investment, reasonable profits must be made possible. In today's world, projects compete with the stock market for Return on Investment. So, yes, profit is an important element of getting private investment to the island. Private investment is needed to redevelop the aging shopping center, hotels and any other commercial structures. In a free and open market, it is profitable companies that typically provide higher quality service. On Jekyll, we have had hotels that went bankrupt and we suffered the negative impact of poor service and lack of re-investment.

6. The island does belong to the people of Brunswick, the legislators in Atlanta (and from across the state), the residents of the island. You are right, it belongs to ALL citizens of Georgia.

7. Since the Jekyll Island Authority is an entity of state government, citizens can make their desires known to their elected representatives, including the Governor. As with most issues, the General Assembly serves to carry out the wishes of the citizens. Not much would get done if every decision was put to a statewide referendum. The Governor and the Legislative leadership including the Jekyll Oversight Committee have expressed support for what we are doing. If it were practical, I would be happy to present our final plans to all the people of Georgia. We are very comfortable that we are doing what meets the desires of the majority of Georgia citizens. We understand however that we will not make everyone happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me correct and respond to some of your statments:</p>
<p>1. The dune system is protected under Georgia law, and these protections are embraced by the Jekyll Island Authority and our partners. None of our plans call for construction that will harm the dune system.</p>
<p>2. Much of the conservation components of the beach village concept plan work towards restoring dune areas and wetlands that were disturbed when the original roads and parking lots were built in the 1950&#8217;s.</p>
<p>3. The Jekyll Island Authority has design guidelines that dictate architectural style which are in keeping with the eclectic mix of architecture found in the Jekyll Island Historic District. Much of this is classic cottage style with shingle roofs and clapboard siding. There is a mix of Italian Rennaissance and Queen Anne influences, and even a mix of tabby stucco, which overall gives it a characteristic that is unique to Jekyll. All new construction must comply with our Design Guidelines.</p>
<p>4. The Jekyll Island Authority must generate revenue to care for the island, including the 250-acre Historic District and the dozens of historic structures. Even though these are public assets, the trend in state government is to rely on private or philanthropic sources for funding. Jekyll Island receives no regular funding from the state budget.</p>
<p>5. In order to attract private capital and investment, reasonable profits must be made possible. In today&#8217;s world, projects compete with the stock market for Return on Investment. So, yes, profit is an important element of getting private investment to the island. Private investment is needed to redevelop the aging shopping center, hotels and any other commercial structures. In a free and open market, it is profitable companies that typically provide higher quality service. On Jekyll, we have had hotels that went bankrupt and we suffered the negative impact of poor service and lack of re-investment.</p>
<p>6. The island does belong to the people of Brunswick, the legislators in Atlanta (and from across the state), the residents of the island. You are right, it belongs to ALL citizens of Georgia.</p>
<p>7. Since the Jekyll Island Authority is an entity of state government, citizens can make their desires known to their elected representatives, including the Governor. As with most issues, the General Assembly serves to carry out the wishes of the citizens. Not much would get done if every decision was put to a statewide referendum. The Governor and the Legislative leadership including the Jekyll Oversight Committee have expressed support for what we are doing. If it were practical, I would be happy to present our final plans to all the people of Georgia. We are very comfortable that we are doing what meets the desires of the majority of Georgia citizens. We understand however that we will not make everyone happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janie hopwood</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>janie hopwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Your magic is to remove all of what makes this place unique and to put in place buildings on the sensitive dune area, take out the natural growth and make the place look like a Caribbean island.
Look I understand that you are doing your job.  Could you just go do it some place else.
What you want is to make a profit off this island that IS PUBLIC land.  If you are so sure of your plan, how about putting to the people in a vote.  Let us evaluate both positions and let all of the people of Georgia vote on it.  That island does not belong to the people of Brunswick, the legislators in Atlanta, or those who have homes on Jekyll.  It belongs to all the people of Georgia,  and all of us should vote on it's future.  Of course, if you don't think you can make your case to the people of Georgia, then it would be your best bet to just convince those in Atlanta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your magic is to remove all of what makes this place unique and to put in place buildings on the sensitive dune area, take out the natural growth and make the place look like a Caribbean island.<br />
Look I understand that you are doing your job.  Could you just go do it some place else.<br />
What you want is to make a profit off this island that IS PUBLIC land.  If you are so sure of your plan, how about putting to the people in a vote.  Let us evaluate both positions and let all of the people of Georgia vote on it.  That island does not belong to the people of Brunswick, the legislators in Atlanta, or those who have homes on Jekyll.  It belongs to all the people of Georgia,  and all of us should vote on it&#8217;s future.  Of course, if you don&#8217;t think you can make your case to the people of Georgia, then it would be your best bet to just convince those in Atlanta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric.garvey</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-905</link>
		<dc:creator>eric.garvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 02:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-905</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;You seem angry that your opinion is that of the minority. The groups that have formally come out in support of our revitalization efforts represent substantial numbers of Georgia citizens. The most important measurement is the number of guests that no longer come to the island. You have exaggerated your numbers, the room you were in had only 120 seats!

&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;The Jekyll Island Authority has been entrusted to be responsible stewards of the island and will continue to honorably fulfill this role. We realize not everyone will agree with our apporach, but we are very comfortable that we are on the right track to doing what is best for the 9.5 million citizens of this great State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>You seem angry that your opinion is that of the minority. The groups that have formally come out in support of our revitalization efforts represent substantial numbers of Georgia citizens. The most important measurement is the number of guests that no longer come to the island. You have exaggerated your numbers, the room you were in had only 120 seats!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>The Jekyll Island Authority has been entrusted to be responsible stewards of the island and will continue to honorably fulfill this role. We realize not everyone will agree with our apporach, but we are very comfortable that we are on the right track to doing what is best for the 9.5 million citizens of this great State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Renke</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Renke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Again, I ask, where are you getting your numbers? City of Brunswick, Glynn Co Commission, Chamber of Commerence ARE NOT most Georgians! Most Georgians oppose Linger Longer's plans. I have attended Linger Longer's presentation that was held on Jekyll, less than 12 people out of the approx 500 that were there thought that LL's plan was good for Jekyll Island and the average Georgian. I was the one who asked the question!
    Again I ask Mr. Porter, where are you getting your numbers? COuld it be from the survey that JIA passed out in Beachscape  mag at the Island's entrance several yrs. ago? Never did see the results published. Could it be that JIA's results are the same as the results that the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island's survey?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I ask, where are you getting your numbers? City of Brunswick, Glynn Co Commission, Chamber of Commerence ARE NOT most Georgians! Most Georgians oppose Linger Longer&#8217;s plans. I have attended Linger Longer&#8217;s presentation that was held on Jekyll, less than 12 people out of the approx 500 that were there thought that LL&#8217;s plan was good for Jekyll Island and the average Georgian. I was the one who asked the question!<br />
    Again I ask Mr. Porter, where are you getting your numbers? COuld it be from the survey that JIA passed out in Beachscape  mag at the Island&#8217;s entrance several yrs. ago? Never did see the results published. Could it be that JIA&#8217;s results are the same as the results that the Initiative to Protect Jekyll Island&#8217;s survey?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larissa.harris</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>larissa.harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;We expect to have a look at revised plans for the beach village area sometime now in April. We want to move quickly, and but also must allow for as much time as it takes to come up with the best plan. 
 
&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;Being very familiar with this area, it is hard for us to believe that the issue is about the view. The current view at this site is not attractive, the foreground is asphalt pavement which runs into the tops of sand dunes. It is an open vista, but you can barely see the horizon and can not see the beach at all. The views a little to the north and to the south are much better and I think that may be what you are thinking of.
 
&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;We expect the plans for a beach village in this area will enhance the view and public use of this area tremendously. We think about trees that can be added to provide shaded parking and shaded sitting areas. We like to use planned landscaping to frame natural views. This area was flattened to create the parking lot. By removing it and incorporating swales that mimic a secondary dune system, we can create small water features and slightly elevation changes to improve the beach view. And why wouldn't we want to do this? It would make no sense for us to ruin the shoreline. We want to revitalize Jekyll Island so that people want to come. And we want to preserve the "magic" that makes people want to return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>We expect to have a look at revised plans for the beach village area sometime now in April. We want to move quickly, and but also must allow for as much time as it takes to come up with the best plan. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>Being very familiar with this area, it is hard for us to believe that the issue is about the view. The current view at this site is not attractive, the foreground is asphalt pavement which runs into the tops of sand dunes. It is an open vista, but you can barely see the horizon and can not see the beach at all. The views a little to the north and to the south are much better and I think that may be what you are thinking of.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>We expect the plans for a beach village in this area will enhance the view and public use of this area tremendously. We think about trees that can be added to provide shaded parking and shaded sitting areas. We like to use planned landscaping to frame natural views. This area was flattened to create the parking lot. By removing it and incorporating swales that mimic a secondary dune system, we can create small water features and slightly elevation changes to improve the beach view. And why wouldn&#8217;t we want to do this? It would make no sense for us to ruin the shoreline. We want to revitalize Jekyll Island so that people want to come. And we want to preserve the &#8220;magic&#8221; that makes people want to return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larissa.harris</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-899</link>
		<dc:creator>larissa.harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;Chairman Porter may have an additional response to your question, but the Jekyll Island plans for revitalization continue to receive positive support from many citizens and organizations. The Brunswick City Council along with Brunswick Mayor Brian Thompson &lt;a target="blank" href="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/Resolution_Signed_by_Mayor_Thompson.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;passed a resolution&lt;/a&gt; proclaiming such, as well as the &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/County_Resolution_sent _from_WWoodside.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Glynn County Commission&lt;/a&gt;. These were passed unanimously, and those respective governments represent over 70,00 people. The Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of Commerce with 1400 members also voted in support, as did the Tourism Development Alliance of Georgia. The Governor of this state, the Lt. Governor and the leadership of the General Assembly have also supported our plans. 
 
&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;Over the last several years, the Jekyll Island Authority, and lately representatives from Linger Longer, have engaged in frequent civic club presentations across the state to share the vision and plans for revitalization. I have personally presented this information and in fact provided another update for the Brunswick Rotary Club yesterday. It is rare that anyone expresses a negative response to the plans, and most often folks are relieved once they understand what we are trying to do. Those with a negative bias are often frustrated by the amount of misinformation being distributed by opponents of revitalization.
 
&lt;img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"&gt;But most importantly, Georgians have indicated their opinion by choosing to spend their vacations at other beach destinations. One may argue about the degree, but clearly visitation to Jekyll Island has been declining for a long time and it can not be allowed to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>Chairman Porter may have an additional response to your question, but the Jekyll Island plans for revitalization continue to receive positive support from many citizens and organizations. The Brunswick City Council along with Brunswick Mayor Brian Thompson <a target="blank" href="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/Resolution_Signed_by_Mayor_Thompson.pdf" rel="nofollow">passed a resolution</a> proclaiming such, as well as the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/County_Resolution_sent _from_WWoodside.pdf" rel="nofollow">Glynn County Commission</a>. These were passed unanimously, and those respective governments represent over 70,00 people. The Brunswick-Golden Isles Chamber of Commerce with 1400 members also voted in support, as did the Tourism Development Alliance of Georgia. The Governor of this state, the Lt. Governor and the leadership of the General Assembly have also supported our plans. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>Over the last several years, the Jekyll Island Authority, and lately representatives from Linger Longer, have engaged in frequent civic club presentations across the state to share the vision and plans for revitalization. I have personally presented this information and in fact provided another update for the Brunswick Rotary Club yesterday. It is rare that anyone expresses a negative response to the plans, and most often folks are relieved once they understand what we are trying to do. Those with a negative bias are often frustrated by the amount of misinformation being distributed by opponents of revitalization.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jekyllisland.com/blogs/spacer.gif" width="20" height="8"/>But most importantly, Georgians have indicated their opinion by choosing to spend their vacations at other beach destinations. One may argue about the degree, but clearly visitation to Jekyll Island has been declining for a long time and it can not be allowed to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lori jobe</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>lori jobe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-898</guid>
		<description>I am anxious to see the revised plans for the redevelopment of Jekyll.  When will they be available?  It is such a relief to know that the JIA has "no intention of lining the beach with condos".   
BUT you know that the controversy has nothing to do with the parking lot, and when you lead people to believe that then it really discredits your potentially noble cause of making Jekyll the best that it can be.  
I would love to see an Environmental Discovery Center, an Oceanside playground on this property, improved bike paths, and concession areas.  However, I don't think that trees and improved landscaping are necessary  - I mean, really - how can you improve on the beauty of that ocean view?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am anxious to see the revised plans for the redevelopment of Jekyll.  When will they be available?  It is such a relief to know that the JIA has &#8220;no intention of lining the beach with condos&#8221;.<br />
BUT you know that the controversy has nothing to do with the parking lot, and when you lead people to believe that then it really discredits your potentially noble cause of making Jekyll the best that it can be.<br />
I would love to see an Environmental Discovery Center, an Oceanside playground on this property, improved bike paths, and concession areas.  However, I don&#8217;t think that trees and improved landscaping are necessary  - I mean, really - how can you improve on the beauty of that ocean view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Renke</title>
		<link>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Renke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.jekyllisland.com/in-the-news/just-the-facts/opponents-of-jekyll-revitalization-misguided/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Got a question for you, Mr. Porter. You state that must Georgians want to see the JIA move a head with Linger Longer's plan. Where do you get you numbers? What I am hearing is just the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a question for you, Mr. Porter. You state that must Georgians want to see the JIA move a head with Linger Longer&#8217;s plan. Where do you get you numbers? What I am hearing is just the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
